1 Department of Bioresource Policy Business and Economics, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8, Canada

2 Root and Tuber Improvement Division, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, P.M.B. 5320 Ibadan, Nigeria


The Nigerian rice sector has made remarkable improvement in the last decade as production has increased significantly thereby reducing the gap between domestic supply and demand. In the last three decades, rice imports make up greater proportion of Nigerian imports as rice forms a structural component of the Nigerian diet. Past government inconsistent policies were not successful in securing good market share for domestic rice producers, hence producers suffered great losses. The recent resurgence of interest by the present administration to intensify domestic rice production has yielded positive results. The objective of this study is to analyze and assess the costs and benefits of intensification of rice production systems in southeastern Nigeria using a policy analysis matrix approach. Multi Stage sampling technique was employed in selecting 75 upland and 75 lowland rice farmers who were interviewed with structured and validated questionnaire. Data were analyzed using Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). The result shows that upland; lowland and double rice cropping systems in southeastern Nigeria are profitable based on the policy analysis matrix (PAM) model, and rice production under various systems and technologies is socially profitable and financially competitive. While there exist comparative advantage in the various production systems, with lowland and double cropping being highest, substantial tax was imposed on rice imports in Nigeria and government investment in intensifying rice production had a positive impact on the output of local rice production. The study concludes with strategies for the development of rice sub sector in Nigeria.


1- Adesina, A. A. and O. Coulibaly (1998). Policy and Competitiveness of Agro forestry based Technologies for Maize Production in Cameroon. An Application of Policy Analysis Matrix Agricultural Economics 1334: 1-3.
2- Akpokodje, G., F. Lancon and O. Erenstein (2001). Nigerian’s Rice Economy: State of the Art Paper presented at International Conference of West African Rice Development Association (WARDA) Bouake, Cote d’ Ivoire, Nov. 2001.
3- Ernstain, O. and Larcon, F. (2002): Potentials and Prospects for Rice Production in West Africa. Paper Presented at the Sub-Regional Workshop on Harmonization of Policies and Coordination of Programmes on Rice in the ECOWAS Sub-Region, Accra, Ghana.
4- Ezedinma, C.I. (2001). Economic Evaluation and Prospects for Double Rice Crop Production in Humid Forest Inland Valley Ecosystems of South Eastern Nigeria. Tropricultura Journal, vol.19, No.4, pp 161-165.
5- Fabusoro, E. (2000). Analysis of Rice Farming System in Ogun State and its Implications for Extension Programme. 1-102. University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria
6- Federal Office of Statistics (1999). Annual Abstract of Statistics, FOS, Lagos, p.2
7- Food and Agricultural Organization (1996). Production yearbook. Vol. 49-Rome.
8- Iheke, O.R. and Nwaru, J.C. (2008). Comparative Analysis of the Mean Output of Rice and Profit by Men and Women in Rice Production Systems in Abia State of Nigeria. Agricultural Journal 3 (2): pp 147 – 151.
9- Obibuaku, L.O. (1979). The Effectiveness of selected Extension Methods in Influencing Farm Improvement Nigerian Agricultural Journal, 11(2): 143 – 149.
10- Pearson, S. R. and E. A. Monke. (1989). The Policy Analysis Matrix: A Manual for Practitioners. Pragma Corporation, Washington, D.C U. S. A.
11- Singh, B.N. (1997). Rice Growing Environments and Biophysical constraints in Different Ecological zones in Nigeria. Met. J, 2(1): 35-44.
12- WARDA. (2000). The Nigerian Rice Economy in a Competitive World: Constraints, Opportunities and Strategic Choices, Concept Note Submitted to USAID.