Document Type: Original Article


Assistant professors of Soil Science, University of Zanjan, Iran


In this study, qualitative land suitability evaluation was made for research station of East Azarbaijan, for tomato, potato, onion and bean. The study was done using Simple Limitation Method (SLM), Limitation Method regarding Number and Intensity (LMNI) and Parametric Methods (PM) such as the square root and the Storie methods. The results from different methods indicated that the most important limiting factors are Organic Matter (OM), salinity and sodicity and calcium carbonates, either alone or in combination. Evaluation indicated that the (SLM) and (LMNI) mainly show similar suitability classes, but Parametric methods especially square root method which it's results revealed to be more realistic show different suitability classes in many cases. According to the square root method, the area can be recommended as marginally suitable for cultivation of tomato and potato and expected to yield about 40-65% of optimal production.


1- Banaei, M.H. (1998). Soil Moisture and Temperature Regime Map of Iran . Soil and Water Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Tehran, Iran.

2- FAO (1976). A framework for land evaluation system. Soil Bulletin, 32, FAO, Rome, 72pp.

3- Jafarzadeh, A.A., Alamdari, P., Neishabouri, M.H., & Saedi, S. (2008). Land suitability evaluation of Bilverdi Research Station for wheat, barely, alfalfa, maize and sanflower. Soil and Water Research, 3, 81-88.

4- Jafarzadeh, A.A., Khoshazaman, T., Neyshabouri, M.R., & Shahbazi, F. (2005). Qualitative evaluation of land suitability in Karkaj Research Station of Tabriz University for wheat, potato, maize, tomato, bean and alfalfa, pp. 95–102. In: Int. Conference of ICEM, Hyderabad, India. October 28-30.

5- Kamkar, B., Dorri, M. A., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2014).Assessment of land suitability and the possibility and performance of a canola (Brassica napus L.)– Soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation in four basins of Golestan Province, Iran.The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 17, 95-104.

6- Khiddir, S.M. (1986). A statistical approach in the use of parametric systems applied to the FAO framework for land evaluation. Unpublished thesis. State University Ghent.

7- Safari, Y., Esfandiarpour-Boroujeni, I., Kamali, A., Salehi, M. H., & Bagheri-Bodaghabadi, M. (2013). Qualitative land suitability evaluation for main irrigated crops in the shahrekord plain, Iran: A geostatistical approach compared with conventional method. Pedosphere, 23(6), 767-778.

8- Sarvari, S.A., & Mahmoudi, S.H. (2001).Qualitative land suitability evaluation for irrigated sugar beet in Ghazvin region. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water, 15, 66-74.

9- Soil Survey Staff. (1993). Soil survey manual. agricultural handbook. No. 18, US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC.

10- Soil Survey Staff. (2014). Keys to soil taxonomy. 12th Ed., US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC.

11- Storie, R. E. (1978). The Storie Index Soil Rating Revised. Davis,CA, University of California, Division of Agricultural Science, Special Publication No 3203.

12- Sys, C., & Verheye, W. (1974). Land evaluation for irrigation of arid regions by the use of the parameter method. Trans. 10th International Soil Congress, Moscow, 149-155.

13- Sys, C., Van Ranst, E., & Debaveye, J. (1991a). Land evaluation. Part I: Principles in land evaluation and crop production calculations. Agricultural Publication. No. 7. General Administration for Development Cooperation, Brussels, Belgium.

14- Sys, C., Van Ranst, E., & Debaveye, J. (1991b). Land evaluation. Part II: Methods in land evaluation. Agricultural Publication. No.7. General Administration for Development Cooperation, Brussels, Belgium.

15- Sys, C., Van Ranst, E., & Debaveye, J. (1993). Land evaluation. Part III: Crop Requirements. Agricultural Publications. No. 7. General Administration for Development Cooperation, Brussels, Belgium.