Document Type : Original Article


1 M.A., Agricultural Management, Department of Agricultural Extension, Education and Management, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Agricultural Economics, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Tabriz


The purpose of this study was to measure the technical efficiency of canola farmers and determine the underpinning factors. Required data were collected using stratified random sampling method and questionnaire survey. In this context, 157 canola farmers from Tabriz County, Iran, were asked to fill out the questionnaire in 2012-2013 growing season. The technical efficiency was evaluated using stochastic frontier approach. The results of inputs production elasticity indicated that all inputs were consumed in economic area. In addition, the highest (0.504) and lowest (0.095) elasticity rate was related to water consumption and education level, respectively. The estimated technical efficiency demonstrated that the highest and lowest technical efficiencies were 25 and 95% with an average of 80%. It should be noted that the highest efficiency was observed in the farms with the area covering 3-4 hectares. Furthermore, the estimated inefficiency model indicated that education level, training course number, and cultivated area negatively affected the inefficiency. By contrast, age of farmer had a positive effect on inefficiency. As the results show, educating and training farmers for the optimum use of inputs as well as improving their knowledge as to promote agricultural products should be taken into account. 


Necessary to educational and promotional programs to promote farmers’ skills      

Highest technical efficiency in 2-4 hectares lands

Considerable scope to improve canola growers in east Azerbaijan



Main Subjects

Adenuga, H., Muhammad-Lawal, A., &Rotimi, O. A. (2013). Economics and technical efficiency  of dry season tomato production selected areas in Kwara State, Nigeria. Agris On-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 5(1), 11-19.
Agom, I. D., Ben Ohen, S., OkoiItam, K., & NyambiInya, N. (2012). Analysis of Technical efficiency of small holder cocoa farmers in Cross River State, Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development,2(3), 177-185.
Ahmadi, M.R., & Javidfar, F. (1998). Canola nutrition, Joint Stock Company of oilseeds cultivation. Unpublished Report.
Aigner, D.J., Lovell, C.A.K. & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6, 21-37.
Battese, G.E., & Coelli, T. J. (1995). Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: With application to paddy farmers in India. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3 (1), 153–169.
Battese, G.E. (1991). Frontier production functions and technical efficiency: A survey of empirical applications in agricultural economics.Agricultural Economics, 7,185-208.
Dashti, G., Yavari, S., Pishbahar, E., & Hayati, B. (2011). Factors affecting technical efficiency of broiler chicken units in Songhor and Kolyaeecity. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 21(3), 83-95 (In Persian).
Doorandish, A., Nikokar, A., Hoseinzadeh, M., & Looshabi, A. (2013). Multi-product technical performance of dairy farms in North Khorasan province. Agricultural Economics andDevelopment, 2, 112-122 (In Persian).
East Azerbaijan Jihad-Agriculture Organization. (2014). Agricultural Statistics Year Book, Department of Planning and Economic, Tabriz, Iran.
Esfandyari, M., Shahraki, J. Z., & Karbasi, A. (2013). Determining the technical efficiency along with rice production risk in Marvdasht city. Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh and Sazandegy) 100, 76-91 (In Persian).
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253-290.
Hanley, N., & Spash, C. L. (1993). Farm management research for small farmer development. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Karthic, V. K., Alagumani, T., & Amarnath, J. S. (2013). Resource–use efficiency and technical efficiency of turmeric production in Tamil Nadu, Department of Agricultural Economics,Agricultural College and Research Institute,Madurai-641003. Tamil Nadu. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 26(1), 109-114.
Mehrgan, M. R. (2004). Evaluation of the organizations performance, quantitative approach using data envelopment analysis,quantitative Tehran University Press, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammed, R., & Saghaian, S. (2014). Technical efficiency estimation of rice production in South Korea. Selected paper prepared for presentation at the 2014 Southern Agricultural Economics, Association (SAEA) Annual Meetings in Dallas, 1-16.
Onyenweaku, C. E., & Effiong, E. O. (2006). Technical efficiency in pig production in Akwa-Ibom State, Nigeria. Paper presented at the 40thAnnual Conference of the Agricultural Society of Nigeria held at NRCRI, Umudike.
Otieno, D. J., Hubbard, L., & Ruto, E. (2012). Determinants of technical efficiency in beef cattle production in Kenya. Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) Triennial Conference, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil, 18-24 August.
Pishbahar, E., & Nasiri, A. (2012). Study on the technical performance of strawberry producers in Sanandaj city. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Production Science, 22(4), 125-134 (In Persian).
Rafati, M., Azarinfar, Y. A., Zad, M., Barabari, A., & Kazemnejad, M. (2011). Study of technical, allocative and economic efficiency in cotton farms in Gorgan, Golestan Province. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 3(1), 121-141. (In Persian).
Trujillo, J. C., & Iglesias, W.J. (2014). Measurement of the technical efficiency of small pineapple farmers in Santander, Colombia: A stochastic frontier approach. Brazilian Journal of Rural Economics and Sociology, 51(1), 49-62.
Zeranejad, M., &Hajiabad, R. (2009). Assessment of the technical efficiency of wheat production in Iran. Journal of Economic Research, 9(2), 147-151 (In Persian).