Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran

Abstract

Due to the frequent drought periods, water consumption increase, and competition of different water-using sectors, the Hirmand catchment is in a critical water status in the Sistan region. This threat has been intensified in recent years. To cope with this problem, we must pay more attention to different types of water use such as virtual water as a water saving method. The present study calculates virtual water demand of agricultural products in the Sistan region in the cropping year of 2013-2014 using water evaluation and planning (WEAP) system. Furthermore, impacts of the implementation of the virtual water scenarios are predicted on water resources and consumption over the 2015-2030 period. Results show that tomato and alfalfa have less virtual water demand despite their high water requirements due to their high production yield. Furthermore, wheat and barley have the highest virtual water demand. Also, the results of the WEAP model reveal that in the virtual water scenario, the mean annual water demand is lower than the current account (61% for net efficiency, 17% for current efficiency). Consequently, unmet demand will be reduced about 383 million m3. Therefore, given the prevalence of drought in the region, it is appropriate to implement this scenario to protect water resources. Hence, it is highly recommended to orient planning and investment in agricultural development projects of the Sistan region with the concept of virtual water.

Graphical Abstract

Highlights

  • Virtual water is one of the most important approaches to water resources management.
  • This approach in the Hirmand watershed, where there is severe drought, has been implemented by combining the WEAP model.
  • The results show the effective saving of water by implementing a virtual water scenario.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abbaspour, K. C., Faramarzi, M., Ghasemi, S.S., & Yang. H. (2009). Assessing the impact of climate change on water resources in Iran. Water Resource Research., 45, 1-16.

Allan, J.A. (1998). Virtual water: A long term solution for water short Middle Eastern economies? Occasional Paper 3, School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), Paper presented at the 1997 British Association Festival of Science, Roger Stevens Lecture Theatre, and University of Leeds. Water and Development Session.

Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, FAO, Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/docrep/X0490E/X0490E00.htm

Allen, R.G., Smith, M., Perrier, A., & Pereira. L.S. (1994). An update for the definition of reference evapotranspiration. ICID Bulletin, 43 (2), 1–34.

Ardakanian, R. (2005). Overview of water management in Iran, in Water Conservation, Reuse, and Recycling. Proceedings of an Iranian-American Workshop, The National Academies Press, Washington, D. C. pp. 18–33.

Choi, S., Lee, D.R., Moon, J.W., & Kang, S.K. (2010). Application of K-WEAP (Korea-integrated water resources evaluation and planning model). Journal of Korea Water Resources Association. 43(7), 625-633.

Condom, T., Escobar, M., Purkey, D., Pouget, J.C., Suarez, W., Ramos, C., Apaestegui, J., Zapata, M., Gomez, J., & Vergara. W. (2011). Modeling the hydrologic role of glaciers within a Water Evaluation and Planning System (WEAP): A case study in the Rio Santa watershed (Peru). Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 8(1), 869-916.

Dimova, G., Tzanova, E., Ninovb, P., & Ribarova. M. (2014). Complementary use of the WEAP model to underpin the development of SEEAW physical water use and supply tables. Procedia Engineering, 70, 563 –572.

Hanasaki, N., Inuzuka, T., Kanae, S., & Oki, T. (2010). An estimation of global virtual water flow and sources of water withdrawal for major crops and livestock products using a global hydrological model. Hydrology Journal, 384, 232–244.

Hoekstra, A.Y., & Hung, P.Q. (2005). Globalization of water resources: International virtual water flows inrelation to crop trade. Global Environmental Change, 15(1), 45-56

Hollermann, B., Giertz, S., & Diekkrüger, B. (2010). Balancing Future Water Availability and Demand Using the WEAP ‘Water Evaluation and Planning’ System. Water Resource Management, 24, 3591–3613.

Lévite, H., Hilmy, S., & Cour, J. (2003). Testing water demand management scenarios in a water-stressed basin in South Africa: application of the WEAP model. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 28,779–786.

Li, X.E., Zhao, Y., Shi, C., Sha, J., Wang, Z.L., & Wang, Y. (2015). Application of Water Evaluation and Planning (WEAP) mode l for water resources management strategy estimation in coastal Binhai New Area, China. Ocean & Coastal Management, 106, 97-109.

Mounir, Z.M., Ma, C.M., & Amadou, I. (2011). Application of water evaluation and planning (WEAP): a model to assess future water demands in the Niger River (in Niger republic). Modern Applied Science, 5(1), 38-49.

Mugatsia, E. (2010). Simulation and scenario analysis of water resources management in Perkerra catchment using WEAP model’. Unpublished thesis, Department of civil and structural engineering, The University of Moi, Kenya.

Oki, T. & Kanae. S. (2004). Virtual water trade and world water resources. Water Science and Technology, 49(7), 203-209.

Ramirez, J. & Rogers. P. (2004). Virtual Water Flows & Trade Liberalization. Water Science & Technology, 49 (7), 25-32.

Rashki, A., Kaskaoutis, D.G., Rautenbach, C.J.deW., Eriksson, P.G., Qiang, M., & Gupta, P. (2012). Dust storms and their horizontal dust loading in the Sistan region, Iran. Aeolian Research, 5, 51–62.

Sardar Shahraki, A., Shahraki, J., & Hashemi Monfared, S.A. (2016). An Application of WEAP Model in Water Resources Management Considering the Environmental Scenarios and Economic Assessment Case Study: Hirmand Catchment. Modern Applied Science, 10(5), 49-56.

Sardar Shahraki, A., Shahraki, J., & Hashemi Monfared, S.A. (2018). An integrated Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method combined with the weap model for prioritizing agricultural development, case study: Hirmand Catchment. ECOPERSIA, 6(4), 205-214.

Shahraki, J., & Sardar Shahraki, A. (2014). Assessing the degree development of Sistan and Baluchestan Cities with emphasis on key indicators of the agricultural sector. Journal of Regional Planning, 4 (15), 13-27.

Shahraki, J., Sardar Shahraki, A., Yaghoubi, M., & Esfandiari, M. (2012). A Survey on the Level of Mechanization Development in Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 8, 2267-2271.

Smith, M., Allen, R.G., Monteith, J.L., Perrier, A., Pereira, L.S., & Segeren, A. (1992). Report on the expert consultation on revision of FAO methodologies for crop water requirements. FAO, Rome, Italy 28–31 May 1990.

Vonk, E., Xu, Y.P., Booij, M.J., Zhang, X., & Augustijn, D.C.M. (2014). Adapting multi reservoir operation to shifting patterns of water supply and demand a case study for the Xinanjiang-Fuchunjiang reservoir cascade. Water Resource Management, 28, 625–643.

Yaqob, Y., Al-Sa`Ed, R., Sorial, G., and Sudian, M. (2015). Simulation of transboundary wastewater resource management scenarios in the Wadi Zomer watershed, using a WEAP model. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 4 (1), 27-35.

Zimmer, D., & Renault, D. (2003). Virtual water in food production and global trade: review of methodological issues and preliminary results. In: Hoekstra, A.Y. (Ed.). Virtual Water Trade: Proceedings of the International Expert Meeting on Virtual Water Trade, 12–13 December 2002. Delft. Value of Water Research Report Series No. 12, UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, the Netherlands.