Poursaeed, A., eshraghi, R. (2017). Recognition the factors affecting the professional development of faculty ) Case Study: Islamic Azad University, Ilam (. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, (), -.
Alireza Poursaeed; roya eshraghi. "Recognition the factors affecting the professional development of faculty ) Case Study: Islamic Azad University, Ilam (". International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, , , 2017, -.
Poursaeed, A., eshraghi, R. (2017). 'Recognition the factors affecting the professional development of faculty ) Case Study: Islamic Azad University, Ilam (', International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, (), pp. -.
Poursaeed, A., eshraghi, R. Recognition the factors affecting the professional development of faculty ) Case Study: Islamic Azad University, Ilam (. International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development, 2017; (): -.
Recognition the factors affecting the professional development of faculty ) Case Study: Islamic Azad University, Ilam (
Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript , Available Online from 19 June 2017
Receive Date: 19 March 2017,
Revise Date: 11 April 2017,
Accept Date: 13 April 2017
Abstract
This study aimed to identify factors affecting the professional development of its faculty members. Statistical society consisted of 902 individuals all of which were faculty members of Islamic Azad University, Ilam that were studied by census method. The survey instrument was a research-made questionnaire which its content and apparent validity was confirmed by experts and its reliability was recognized desirable based on Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Spss21 software and factor analysis technique were used to analysis the collected data. The results of the factor analysis show that development services indicate that four components i.e. structural-service maturity, institutional - directorial maturity, personal and character maturity and network- social maturity were identified as factors affecting the professional development of faculty members which explained 50/89% of the total variance altogether.
Top