Document Type : Original Article


Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Management, Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilam, Iran


Professional development is a continuous process of individual and experimental tests that must empower individual educators to make complex decisions; to identify and to solve problems; to connect theory and practice in learners’ output; and to enable educators to offer learning opportunities to students and prepare them in terms of provided world class standards and citizen responsibilities of adults inspired by these assumptions, the present study aimed to identify factors affecting the professional development of its faculty members. The statistical sample consisted of 902 individuals all of whom were faculty members of the Islamic Azad University, Ilam Branch, Ilam, Iran that were studied by a census method. The survey instrument was a research-made questionnaire whose content and face validity was confirmed by a panel of experts and its reliability coefficient turned out to be at a desirable level. SPSS21 software and factor analysis technique were employed to analyze the collected data. The results of the factor analysis showed that development services indicated that four components, that is, structural-service maturity, institutional-directorial maturity, personal and character maturity and network-social maturity were identified as factors affecting the professional development of faculty members which explained 50.89% of the total variance altogether.


Main Subjects

Baldwin, C. (1998) Effective Approaches to faculty development. Retrieved from
Daily, A. (1993). Burnout preventions and intervention rationale institutional strategies. Journal of the College University Personal Association, 34(1), 15-21.
Golifar, E. (2010). To identify factors affecting the empowerment of faculty members of Iranian. Unpublished thesis, Agricultural Colleges, Tehran University.
King, H. (2004). Continuing Professional Development in Higher Education: what do academics do? Planet, 13(1), 26-29
Nigholls, G. (2000). Professional development, teaching and lifelong learning: The implication for higher education. International Journals of Life Long Education, 19 (4), 370-377.
Rezaeian, A., Khandan, A. A., Ganjaly, A., & Moridian, H. (2014). Development of faculty members in universities (Case Study: faculty members of Imam Sadiq University. Culture in the Islamic University, 4(4), 491-514.
Rolnis, G. (2009). Faculty development in publicly supported two- year colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 33(12), 793-807.
Safari, M., & Niazazari, K. (2014). Analysis of Factors Affecting the Professional Maturity of Faculty Members, Azad University in Azadshahr. Journal of Educational Psychology, 5(3), 1-6.
Schuster, JH., & Associates, DW. (2010). Enhancing Faculty Careers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Skinner, T. (2005). Scientist, Information and Reference Services. Reference library, 49(50), 95-104.
Staisee, GS. (1987). Laptop Schools Lead the Way in Professional Develop. Educational leadership, 53(2), 78-81.
Tylee, J. (2006). Professional Development: General Personal, Social Academic Professional. Retrieved from
Wille, T., & Wilson, C. (1999). Enhancing learning through strategy instruction and group interaction: Is active generation of elaborations critical? Applied Cognitive Psychology,14, 19-30.