Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Student ,Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, college of Agriculture, Birjand Branch,Islamic Azad University

2 Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, agricultural faculty.Islamic Azad University Birjand Branch

3 Associate Professor of Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, college of Agriculture, Ahwaz Branch,Ramin University

4 Associate Professor of Department of Agriculture and Plant Breeding, college of Agriculture, Birjand Branch,Islamic Azad University

Abstract

Objective: Solutions to reduce the vulnerability of farmers and beneficiaries to climate change in Khuzestan province will be discussed.
Methods: The present study was performed in three stages of qualitative study and one stage of quantitative study. The statistical population of the qualitative section consisted of 83 highly experienced farmers and those suffering from climate change, 18exemplary farmers introduced by the Jihad Agricultural Organization of Khuzestan province, 33PhDand237M.A. students in agriculture from various universities in the province as well as100agricultural experts from the Agricultural Jihad Organization. The research variables were also categorized into six solutions and three barriers (challenges) in the third stage of the qualitative investigation, and introduced for a quantitative stage. The fourth stage of the study was a quantitative stage in which the statistical population consisted of 384 farmers and farming beneficiaries in Khuzestan province. The tool for data collection in the quantitative stage of the questionnaire was based on a Likert scale. As well, the sample in the quantitative and qualitative stages was selected via convenience method.
Findings: Economic losses has been affected by various such solutions as economic-financial-support by the government, as well as training-promotional, technical-agricultural and social issues. Also, environmental damages have been affected by economic-financial as well as supportive solutions by the government, training- promotional and institutional-infrastructure issues, and finally psychological-social ills and technical-agricultural damages have been affected by managerial and technical-agricultural solutions, respectively. The solutions stated in the practical dimension face barriers or challenges. Suggestions have been made to address these barriers.

Keywords